The LA Marathon has been officially moved back to a Sunday in March for 2010 - March 21st - which may just fall on the spring equinox (aka the first day of Spring - which may also be Norooz depending). I was happy with the memorial day Marathon this year, although many other runners supposedly were not. The date change threw off training schedules and many expected an unbearable run in the heat. On the contrary, the weather was beautifully overcast and it fell smack on on a milestone birthday for me - which made it the perfect inaugural marathon for your truly.
Apart from the date change, LA organizers also changed the course to the (Dodger) Stadium to Sea (Santa Monica) proposal which recently won approval from the Santa Monica City Council. According to the LA Marathon website, the course will now go through iconic parts of LA including Hollywood, West Hollywood, Beverly Hills and Santa Monica. Personally, I loved this year's course and enjoyed going through downtown and other parts of the city that I wouldn't visit. Beverly Hills and Santa Monica? C'mon - I'm there all the time I don't need to run a marathon through there. The experience of running through the neighborhoods in south Los Angeles was unique and touching - especially the crowds of fans - big and small - who greeted us. They haven't posted the official course online yet, but I'm hoping that it'll go through Silver Lake, Echo Park, and spend more time in parts of LA that may not be the "iconic" spots the Marathon wants to re-affiliate with. Chinatown wouldn't be bad either.
I also liked this year's Marathon course because of the loop of the race - We started in downtown and ended in downtown. The logistics of starting at Dodger Stadium and ending in Santa Monica is something of a nightmare. Are runners expected to park to the start and hitchhike back with sore legs, sore bodies and potential digestive problems that plague long distance runners (believe me, it's not pretty)? When the course went from Universal Studios to downtown in years prior, theorganizers could at least tout the metro system as a convenient way to get around This is SO not the case with Santa Monica. I hope that the organizers keep these kinds of problems in mind when they decide to manage the course in the process of confirming the LA Marathon as a legimitate 26.2 mile race that keeps runners in mind first rather than showy external appearances. The good thing about the loop course was that spectators could travel along the metro system to a degree and watch the runners. I feel like this stadium to see course should have received some sort of community feedback before its confirmation for next year's marathon.
I would also recommend extending this philosophy to the expo event the weekend before race day. This year's LA Marathon expo was underwheling and a sad representation of what a true marathon convention should be - It was a poor showing in comparison to Pasadena's Expo. In Pasadena, the organizers culled from local community running clubs and organization, wheras the LA Marathon expo was all about the sponsors and some internet-based resellers. The impression was that it was very costly to get a booth at LA, whereas Pasadena was very much community-focused.
In truth, I loved the Pasadena Marathon, eventhough I did the 5K and found the parking situation a bit confusing - But the vibe of that event (DESPITE the fact that the rain was merciless) was all about the love and fun of running. I may just decide to run Pasadena this next year, but we'll see.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment